The journey of a 1000 miles begins with a single step

Pulp Dharma and Buffet Buddhism

Source: Pulp Dharma and Buffet Buddhism | Great Middle Way

Greatmiddleway.com

Tashi Nyima

Jan 9, 2016

Buddhism today faces two great challenges in the world, and especially in the West: on one hand, there is a misrepresentation of the teachings by those who pretend to know the Dharma better than the Buddha Shakyamuni, and on the other, there is a tendency to appropriate one or another Buddhist method as a self-help technique, outside of the context of the Noble Eightfold Path.

In the branch of “Pulp Dharma” we can identify two main models:

  • that of the ‘masters’ who do not call themselves Buddhist nor accept their intellectual debt to Buddhism, and who promote a Dharma Lite, sprinkled with New Age accretions; and
  • that of the impostors and charlatans (some of them ‘former monks’―that is, individuals who have violated their vows and disrobed) who openly or covertly declare themselves superior to Siddhartha Gautama and His disciples, and who would sell us a sort of Protestant Dharma (sola scriptura), without Buddha and without Sangha.

Both groups are media-savvy, and their marketing is uniformly excellent. They are veritable fonts of books, videos, talks, and retreats (all very profitable), promising us a modernized and putatively improved version of Buddhist teachings. It is not necessary to name names, because the characteristics of these individuals are easily recognizable.

The individuals in the first model do not have now, nor have they ever had, any connection to legitimate Buddhist lineages, and only see in the teachings (gathered from reading texts that they do not understand and are not authorized to share) a vehicle for self-promotion and enrichment. Those in the second model have the audacity to utilize their desertion from authentic lineages, and in many cases their violation of monastic vows, as some sort of ‘virtue’ that validates them as Buddhist authorities.

The branch of “Buffet Buddhism” is more extensive, and includes

  • those ‘masters’ that neither observe themselves nor ask their followers to observe the Five Precepts and the basic practice commitments;
  • those who claim to represent an ‘original’ or ‘early’ Buddhism, cultivate extremely sectarian attitudes, and denigrate traditional lineages;
  • popularizers of putative ‘mindfulness’ and meditation techniques, independently of their essential context within the Noble Eightfold Path;
  • those who make a superficial and exotic presentation of Buddhism, offering an esthetic or cultural experience without spiritual content; and
  • eclectics who attempt to harmonize incompatible beliefs and practices from Hinduism, Christianity, and the New Age, with a Buddhist varnish.

This branch is often recognizable due to the fanaticism and escapism of its members, their vehemence in criticizing authentic Buddhist lineages and practices, and the lack of compassion for human and non-human sentient beings. Of course, many of these groups and individuals also have strong financial interests, although many disguise them in order to attract new adepts.

Buddhism does not consist of isolated techniques or the fraudulent teachings of self-proclaimed masters. There is no genuine Dharma without lineage. There is no Buddhism without Buddha, Dharma, and Sangha. There is no Dharma without Right View, Right Thought, Right Speech, Right Conduct, Right Livelihood, Right Effort, Right Mindfulness, and Right Concentration.

Advertisements

2 responses

  1. One could argue that any spreading of “Pulp Buddhism” is actually a positive thing. Sooner or later these practitioners will come across the authentic teachings and not only have an interest or connection but also a foundation of Buddhist values that have slowly built up inside of them. Here it would be important to recognize that we are all on the path and some of us are just at different stages. Many people who are involved in “Pulp Buddhism” would not have any connection to the Buddhas teachings otherwise because they might find traditional Buddhism too churchy or stuffy with foreign and outdated culture . Is it not better that these people have in this life begun the path to enlightenment or should they be stuck with only the offers of the traditionally violent and destructive western and eastern religions?

    January 10, 2016 at 4:28 am

    • Lou

      Thank you, great point.

      January 10, 2016 at 4:33 am

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s